|
Whirling Disease in Yellowstone National Park: Two Researchers, One Problem
by Amy Rose, Silvia Murcia, Julie Alexander
Part I: The Big Picture
Myxobolus cerebralis was first detected in Yellowstone cutthroat trout from Yellowstone Lake in 1998. Since then efforts have been directed at determining severity and spatial extent of M. cerebralis in the Lake and its cutthroat spawning tributaries. From 1999 to 2001 a large-scale investigation was conducted focusing on histological analysis of by-catch adult Yellowstone cutthroat trout and sentinel fry exposures in cutthroat trout spawning streams over a wide range of water temperatures and flow regimes. Examination of over 1,500 fish revealed the prevalence of the parasite ranging from near 20 percent in the northern section of Yellowstone Lake to about 10 percent in the south arms. Dr. Todd Koel, the Supervisory Fisheries Biologist for the Park and whirling disease researcher, oversees much of this investigation. He monitors waters throughout the park including the tributaries of the Lake; conducts his own research projects and coordinates a team of researchers from the Park, Montana State University, the University of Wyoming, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Western Fisheries Research Center, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service-Bozeman Fish Health Laboratory, and the states of Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming. The Yellowstone Whirling Disease Research Program has been funded primarily by the Whirling Disease Initiative, the Whirling Disease Foundation, and the National Park Service.
Pelican Creek, a spawning tributary to Yellowstone Lake, became a priority of whirling disease research when monitoring during the large-scale investigation revealed that the cutthroat population had been almost completely wiped out by the disease. The presence and effects of the whirling disease parasite created a critical situation almost immediately. Due to Yellowstone National Park's conservation and preservation goals of maintaining a natural and pristine ecological system, human interference such as stocking fish to replace lost populations is not typically an option. The loss of cutthroat trout in Pelican Creek has created a gap in the natural food chain with trophic level implications. Birds and bears are required to switch to a different prey base and, on a social level, anglers have lost a favorite trout fishery—a fishery often touted as the best cutthroat fishery in the world. Pelican Creek is now closed to angling to allow the cutthroat to rebound and prevent the potential movement of the parasite into other drainages in the Park.
Solutions Through Research
Silvia Murcia is a researcher for the Yellowstone Whirling Disease Research Program and a graduate student pursuing a doctorate in Fish and Wildlife Management at Montana State University-Bozeman. Under the advisement of premier whirling disease researcher, Dr. Billie Kerans, Murcia's research focuses on spatio-temporal variation in whirling disease risk to the Yellowstone cutthroat trout in three spawning tributaries of Yellowstone Lake: Pelican Creek, Clear Creek, and the Yellowstone River.
One puzzling aspect of her study is why the problem is so severe in Pelican Creek. Murcia postulates that the answer may be the result of a combination of environmental factors: the movement of buffalo and elk adds organic material to the water, naturally occurring high water temperatures, and angler movement may help spread the disease. All of these factors have helped create a warm, mucky habitat ideal for tubificid and whirling disease proliferation.
Murcia's research, which began in 2001, analyzes whirling disease presence in sentinel and wild-reared Yellowstone cutthroat fry using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis and histology. For potential correlations to disease prevalence and severity, she also looks at the physico-chemical features of the environment around and within the focus tributaries.
To establish infection risk among the wild native cutthroats, she is also examining current and historical adult Yellowstone cutthroat trout spawning data (to assess the start, peak, and end of spawning), the age of collected wild fry, and numbers of adult cutthroat that die after spawning (to determine potential M. cerebralis spore loading).
She hopes her research will answer questions about fish health and diagnostic, management, and control methods for whirling disease in native cutthroat trout and other vulnerable salmonids. Results from her research and the larger scale investigation should assist the Park and other regional fisheries managers understand and control whirling disease in a variety of stream types. Quantification of environmental characteristics preferred by M. cerebralis in the Yellowstone Lake basin will assist in predicting probable high-risk sites for infection. Of particular concern are tributary basins with landscape-level characteristics similar to Pelican Creek, such as Beaverdam, Trail, and Chipmunk Creeks in the remote south and southeast arms of Yellowstone Lake.
Dr. Kerans will use Murcia's data to further develop of a whirling disease risk assessment model that could be applied to a range of watersheds across the Intermountain West. This model has a good chance of helping fish biologists and managers identify future management actions to reduce disease risk, increase public awareness, and reduce the chances of this non-native pathogen from invading other systems.
Part II: Filling in the Gaps
Another student of Dr. Kerans, Julie Alexander, started research on the same project in June 2004. Alexander will compliment Murcia’s work by investigating the oligochaete role in the whirling disease problem in Pelican Creek. She is examining the potential of high resolution thermal imagery and habitat characteristics to detect “hot spots” of M. cerebralis infection and high tubificid abundance. Alexander is working on this project in pursuit of her PhD in biology. The focus of her dissertation is parasite-mediated Tubifex tubifex ecology. The specific objectives of her research are to:
- document M. cerebralis infection risk in Pelican Creek by assessing infection in the T. tubifex host and in sentinel fish exposures,
- assess the physical and chemical habitat characteristics at tubificids collection sites, and,
- correlate M. cerebralis infection risk to habitat characteristics and high-resolution thermal imagery.
Prior to the start of her research, thermal imaging conducted by NASA was completed on the entire length of Pelican Creek for the larger scale investigation. The Yellowstone Ecosystem Research Center then analyzed these data and compiled GIS data files. Alexander's results—percent of infected T. tubifex, abundances of tubificids, and T. tubifex and physico-chemical habitat characteristics—will be related to data from the thermal images.
Alexander has also mapped the spatial distribution of the parasite to help detect the infection in worms and fish. For Pelican Creek, Alexander used Murcia's data as a baseline. This year, she is using Murcia's study methods to create her own data set of infection prevalence and parasite severity for mapping purposes. Further, because the abundance of infection in Pelican Creek made it nearly impossible to draw decisive conclusions about what could be causing or affecting the parasite's ability to proliferate, Alexander's study area was expanded to cover 12 tributaries rather than the previous year's sole tributary, Pelican Creek.
Another component of Alexander's investigation involves documenting the actinosporean varieties and numbers that may be present. Actinosporeans (the phase of the parasite expelled by the tubifex worm) have presented yet another mystery to researchers in the Park. Collaboration with Charlotte Rasmussen and Kendra Kinnan, USGS Western Fisheries Research Center, showed that twenty of 3,037 tubificids collected in Yellowstone National Park in 2001 produced actinospores, and PCR analysis indicated that none of them were M. cerebralis. The team is now wondering whether there are other myxosporidians in the Park. If there are new and different myxosporidians and actinosporeans in the system, the potential for new and different problems, either affecting fish or other living parts of the system, creates an additional management concern.
Alexander's field work is expected to fill in gaps identified by the principal investigators, Drs. Kerans and Koel. Results should explain why whirling disease risk varies as a function of host ecology, assemblage community, habitat, and the variable interactions among six tributaries to Yellowstone Lake.
Overall, Murcia's and Alexander's work will contribute to the larger scale investigations. Results can be used to determine an appropriate management strategy for the area. Ultimately, once infected reaches are located, appropriate actions (riparian management or sediment removal) may be evaluated.
Yellowstone National Park and many other organizations in the Intermountain West are working to restore native salmonids. Knowledge of the relationships among the environment, tubificid susceptibility, and whirling disease risk would improve the prioritization process of stream restoration and increase the probability of costly restoration success. In addition, this quantitative data should improve the ability of managers to carry out risk assessments particularly for native cutthroat trout in other back country areas. As whirling disease spreads across the Intermountain West it is likely to invade other pristine areas and techniques for management in these areas will be needed. Thus, this work may become a model for such areas.
About Silvia:
Silvia is from Barcelona, Spain and has been living in the United States since she arrived in the White Mountains area of New Hampshire at age 18 for a high-school student exchange program. Silvia liked the area and lifestyle—streams, forests, sports, and schooling—so much, that she decided to attend school there an additional year. She then attended college in Boston graduating from Northeastern University with a major in biology and a minor in marine studies.
After graduation, Silvia entered the East-West Marine Biology Program working out of the University of Washington's Friday Harbor Laboratories, and the University of the West Indies Discovery Bay Marine Laboratories in Jamaica. She then continued on with her education entering graduate school at Montana State University, and has been there for the last three years.
She was attracted to her current area of research not only because it granted the opportunity to work in the heart of the Rocky Mountains, but also because whirling disease, salmonids, and fresh water ecology were different from the aquatic subjects she had previously studied. Silvia could not resist the challenge to learn about an entirely new group of fish species, their habitats, diseases, and pathologies.
About Julie:
Julie is a dual citizen of the United States and Canada. She grew up spending periods of time in both Ottawa and Washington, D.C. She credits this experience for the development of a unique mixture of values based on two very different places.
She attended the University of Mary Washington in Fredericksburg, Virginia for two years then went to the University of Tasmania in Australia and finished an undergraduate degree in biology. She says she fell in love with fish while in Australia and was motivated to immediately start working on a master's in natural resource management at James Cook University in Townsville, Australia. Her research focus there was stream restoration via hydraulic upgrades.
Julie worked for the U.S. Federal North Pacific Groundfish Observer Program and the Washington Department of Fish and Game. This gave her the opportunity to work with organisms, salmonids, and other fish from ports of the Aleutians in Alaska to Vancouver to the Puget Sound area. It was during this time that Julie became excited about salmonid research.
Working in Yellowstone National Park
Working in Yellowstone is a fantastic experience, but it does have its challenges. Silvia and Julie have had to maneuver around both regulatory and natural obstacles in order to complete their field work. Park policies such as constant radio contact with rangers, travel restrictions, area restrictions, and parking and traffic rules are details that require constant planning.
For instance, the Park only allows for a short season of access to the research sites in order to accommodate dangerous spring melting and run-off. Access is allowed from approximately mid-July through mid-September and time restrictions are further limited on a daily basis. These restrictions often create significant obstacles to the research, especially in the areas of data collection and analysis.
For Silvia's project, some of the research test sites are so far up the stream that it takes nearly four hours to hike to them, in addition to time spent working at the site. There are several field sites to tend to in one day. Due to Park instituted "bear closure times" that fall within Silvia's test sites, the crew is almost always starting their work-day working against the clock and within extremely tight time limitations.
Both Silvia and Julie have to manage crews in order to accomplish their research and each relate unique experiences working with teams. As crew leader, Silvia has to be aware of the physical demands called for by this type of work. Tremendous physical stamina is required to hike in the heat of the summer while packing sentinel cages, coolers packed with water and live cutthroat fry, and other field equipment. Silvia explained, "The physical labor can be very demanding and I need to account for, and know my crew’s limitations and strengths, and plan accordingly when sketching the season’s timeline. The Park is so large and the study sites so numerous and often remote, accessible only on foot, that I can’t always get everything done that I need or want to get done, or I can’t always obtain the data and information necessary to the study."
Julie described her experience with crews as smooth, positive, and extremely productive. "I've been lucky for my two field seasons to have had a crew that is cooperative and excited about wandering around and looking for worms. I love what I'm doing and sometimes I think that carries over to the people I'm working with. Dan Mahony and Jeff Arnold at the Yellowstone Center for Resources always provide support and assistance with the backcountry trips and have also been an invaluable source of data and knowledge on whirling disease in the Park. In addition, the rangers have been helpful too—allowing us to use cabins that are really meant for backcountry rangers' use only."
Natural disturbances such as uncontrolled, left-to-burn, wildfires precluded Silvia and her crew from reaching many of the study sites in 2003. The fire barred Silvia from setting two of three planned exposures and created a significant data gap for that particular research season. Other unfortunate data gaps have been caused by bears, herds of bison, and elk running over cages. Animals have also dislodged cages causing them to be swept away by strong currents, and opened cage lids, allowing fry to escape.
All of these challenges are taken in stride by Silvia and Julie and ultimately the work continues.
|